Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

Posted on Monday, 29 March, 2021 by arthurohara | Leave a comment

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and MILITARY (#terrorist) components.

The religious component is a contrived concealed element for all of the other components.

Islamisation begins when there are sufficient #Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called religious privileges.

Islam, with over two billion followers, is the second-largest religion globally and projected to outnumber Christians by 2050.

Islam includes major denominations –SUNNI and SHI’A. Internal conflicts, particularly between these casts/sects, have led to serious arms conflicts in several regions. Invariably they don’t live in peace together.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for the latter’s religious privileges, some of the other sinister components will sneakily creep in as well.

Here’s how it works:-

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.

It is a trick.

United States — Muslim 1.34% (update 2020 census)

Australia — Muslim 3.2% (2021 census)

Canada — Muslim 4.9% (2021 census)

China — Muslim 1.8% to 2%

Italy — Muslim 4.8% (2017-2019 census)

Norway — Muslim 3.29% ( 2017-2019 count)

At 2% to 5%, muslims begin to proselytize (to convert or attempt to convert – evangelize) from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

This is happening in:

Denmark — Muslim 2%

Germany — Muslim 3.7%

United Kingdom — Muslim 6% (update 2020 census)

Spain — Muslim 4%

Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

For example, they will push for the introduction of halal food (clean by Islamic standards), thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.

The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions.

In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections. FRANCE.

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues. Think what is going on in Turkey now, after the so called coupe attempt.

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks.

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim.

“The Immigration and Nationality Act” passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, (28), (F) is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by ‘force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.’ This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Whether Islam is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of government are prohibited.”

In very recent times that should be of acquaintance with most, the school headmaster in Batley Yorkshire should be ashamed of himself & removed for issuing any form of apology to Muslim thuggery.

With over twenty years experience dealing with and fighting Middle East terrorism & Islamic fundamentalism, my comments have the authority of a vast experience.

Updated on ongoing basis.

Climate Change Political Corruption to Control People.

Posted on Wednesday, 11 December, 2019 by arthurohara | Leave a comment

@LeoVaradkar @Europarl_EN @EU_Commission @EUCouncil & myriad of EU’s.

But, let’s keep pushing #climatechange because it’s most effective way for gov to control people.

#NASA admits climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, NOT because of SUVs, fossil fuels, cows, etc.

Greta Thunburg is in need of psychological care.

twitter.com/artohara/status/1204694628643037184

How the Internet Steals and Sells your Secrets and Personal Information, Infringes your Privacy and depletes your Personal Identity Security

Posted on Saturday, 7 December, 2013 by arthurohara | 2 Comments

YOU ARE BEING UNFAIRLY TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF BY THE BIGGEST HEIST IN HISTORY, THE ABSOLUTE INVASION OF YOUR PRIVACY AND THE LESSENING OF YOUR IDENTITY SECURITY.

Make them stop by refusing to co-operate. Boycott data thieves.

No matter what you are trying to buy, sell or source online NEVER okay your location or agree to readily giving access and personal information to most apps. It can readily be detrimental and come back to haunt you.

Only ever buy online via secure means – https//.

These thieves are given freedom to defraud because their nefarious ways are not questioned or legislated against by Internet savvy politicians and political parties who are buying and using the personal data harvested. They say it’s not illegal! The political influence is the reason it’s presently classified as not being illegal.

You probably have no idea how much of yourself you have given away on the internet, or how much it’s worth. Never mind Big Brother, the all-seeing state; the real menace online is the Little Brothers – the companies who suck up your personal data, repackage it, then sell it to the highest bidder. The Little Brothers are answerable to no one, and they are every-where.

What may seem innocuous, even worthless information – shopping, musical preferences, holiday destinations, flights, hotel reservations – is seized on by the digital scavengers who sift through cyberspace looking for information they can sell – a mobile phone number, a private email address.

The more respectable data-accumulating companies – Facebook, Google, Amazon, eBay, yahoo – already have all that. Even donating money to charity by texting a word to a number means you can end up on databases as a ‘giver’ and be inundated with phone calls from other noble causes. Once your details end up on a list, you can never quite control who will buy them.

As you surf the web, thousands of ‘third-party cookies’ track your browsing habits. Then there’s your smartphone, which can log information every waking and sleeping moment. Quintillions – yes that really is a number – of pieces of data are being generated by us and about us.

Look for example at Facebook. In a typical week, its users upload 20 billion + items of content, pictures, names, preferences, shopping habits and other tit-bits. All information that can be stored and later employed to help advertisers.

It is presently held as legal for companies to spy on us, and it is very lucrative. Some analysts estimate we’re each giving away up to £5,000 worth of data every year. A worldwide industry has emerged over the past decade that is dedicated to finding new ways of extracting and analysing this bounty. ‘Data brokers’ operate enormous clearing houses which buy, analyse and then sell online and offline data. One of the largest, Acxiom Corporation, is believed to hold information on about 500 million consumers around the world, and has annual sales of more than $1 billion. Many of the big social media companies, including Facebook, work closely with these data brokers – cross-referencing your status updates against postcodes or loyalty-card data from shops. From thousands of fragments, they can build a remarkably detailed picture of you.

They certainly won’t like my article! I’ll be keeping a sharp look out though.

A little further down the chain, companies are scooping up your tweets or Facebook posts, analysing them and selling on the results for a hefty fee. Recently Sony paid $200 million for a company that does exactly that. This doesn’t just affect exhibitionists on Facebook; if you’ve completed the electoral register, your home address is probably only a click away for anyone vaguely interested.

This harvested data can be used to figure out your probable location and logically guess at your consumer behaviour. In one infamous case, a US supermarket responded to a young female customer’s purchases by offering her vouchers for various pregnancy products. These were intercepted by an unsuspecting and very irate father. In another, a GPS service designed to help drivers find quick routes was also selling the information to the Dutch police, who could use it to work out who was breaking local speed limits. Each year, the Little Brothers get more clever.

This makes it easier than ever for companies – and even politicians – to pin you down with personalised and effective marketing, messages and offers. The UK Labour party has recently hired one of Barack Obama’s digital gurus, Matthew McGregor. Don’t be surprised to see creepy targeted ads from Dave, Ed and Nick at the next general election, based on some innocuous comment you might have made on your Facebook page about wind farms or Tory policy on pensions.

How worried should you be? Having slightly less irrelevant ads popping up on your screen hardly amounts to a sustained attack on your freedom. Data brokers can’t break down your door. And after all, when you join a social network or run a search on Google, it’s an exchange: you let people spy on you, and they give you a fulsome service for free.

NOTE; NB:
But this exchange is starting to become a bit one-sided. Every time we download an internet app, we accept a lengthy list of terms and conditions. Unfortunately few of us really know what we’re signing up to – one recent survey found under half of us knew that mobile phone apps can collect and store personal data.

And those terms and conditions? They’re usually comprehensible only to a contract lawyer with a background in software engineering, but we click yes and hope for the best. The results were explained well in a recent documentary, Terms and Conditions May Apply. ‘ The greatest heist in history wasn’t about taking money,’ says the voice-over. ‘It was about taking your information- and you agreed to all of it.’

Agreement, in this case, means clicking ‘OK’ to the contracts that include all sorts of worrying, loosely worded clauses – and which it would take about a month of your life each year to read properly. But perhaps you should set that time aside. A British firm recently included a clause which asked for permission to ‘claim, now and for evermore, your immortal soul’ – a techie’s joke which harvested 7,000 souls in one day.

‘Hello, we’re trying to find somewhere we can smoke…’

When the hugely popular Instagram updated its user agreement to say that ‘a business… may pay us to display your photos… without any compensation to you’, uproar ensued, the clause was removed, and the company declared that it had never intended to sell on photos. But in order to opt out of data collection, or to object to nasty terms and conditions, you have to know exactly who’s collecting your data- and it’s hard to know where to start.

Civil liberties groups are increasingly concerned, because they realise that companies, police and governments have a mutual interest in the gathering of personal data. Nick Pickles, head of Big Brother Watch, says large-scale commercial data collection is a ‘dream come true’ for governments because it dramatically extends the possibility for surveillance. Intelligence agencies don’t need to spy on you any more; they can simply go to the relevant internet companies and prise out of them what they need.

All this data is also a goldmine for fraudsters. Identity theft is increasing, which is no surprise seeing how much information people post about themselves online. Often we’re complicit. In saying where we are on our social media accounts, we also say where we are not. The website pleaserobme.com is a joke – but it has a serious point behind it, a rather brutal reminder of the dangers of location-sharing online.

The internet, of course, is just getting started. More and more everyday objects are being fitted with microchips: fridges, keys, wallets, cars. And even hair: Sony recently filed a patent for a SmartWig that could take photos and vibrate when you receive a message. Google’s augmented reality glasses will be able to record what and who you’re seeing. On a more mundane level, smart energy meters which can record your energy consumption patterns will be installed in every home by 2020. As it stands, no one really knows who will own all this information, and how will it be regulated.

The public is getting worried. So what should we do? The past six months have seen a flurry of ‘crypto–parties’ – free workshops to learn about how to protect your privacy online. (I attended a packed event recently.) Anonymous browsers like ‘TOR’, often used to access the ‘dark net’, are becoming more popular. The dark net is usually referred to as an online underworld where drugs, pornography and worse are bought and sold – but it’s also one of the few places you can go to escape Brothers Little and Big. Even Facebook users who were once happy to share everything are tightening their privacy settings.

Here is another danger. It’s right that people should be able to keep things private, but the vitality of the internet depends on people sharing information: that was the whole point of the net when it began as an academic project in the late 1960s. The more you share, the more you receive. And there are many beneficial uses of data. Professor Nigel Shadbolt, director of the Open Data Institute, says that Google has been extremely successful at using search terms to understand how epidemics spread. Satnav technology is getting better at avoiding traffic jams, because of drivers agreeing to share their progress. (http://www.waze.com). Analysing our energy consumption patterns could cut down bills dramatically.

As a ComSec consultant, I am extra keen to make this a serious discipline. Professor Shadbolt thinks if we can analyse the use of social media while respecting privacy and consent, the benefits to society in general could be immensely important.

The digital revolution has transformed our lives, but the technology that does so much for us comes at an unfair cost. For good or ill, the internet has ravaged notions of privacy: It’s not really possible to get by in the modern world without sharing information about yourself. The question is how to control that.

The Germans already have a term, informationelle selbstbestimmung, which translates into knowing what data you have and being in control over how it’s used. In part, that means us wising up to exactly what data is being sucked out of us. It also requires companies to be transparent about what data they’re sucking – and how they’ll use it. At the moment it’s still too shadowy and confusing. Basic market competition should help. As the value of our personal information grows (and we become more aware of that value), companies that are open about what they’re using will have a significant advantage over competitors. The big players are already looking for ways to give users more control over their data: even Axciom has started to open up a little. It makes good business sense, and probably helps that some savvy politicians and quangos on both sides of the Atlantic are starting to pay more attention to this issue.

The Russian scene is brutal.

But it may be that we do not want the Little Brothers to stop watching us entirely – we’ve become dependent on the services they help to deliver so cheaply. One of the reasons firms like Amazon and Google have grown so huge is that they deliver services which billions of us want. The majority of Europeans now use Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or another social media accounts – none of which charge us a penny. As the saying goes: if you’re not paying, you’re the product.

In Ireland the government and revenue authorities have been holding back on an absolutely crucial postcode system for the country.

Though postal codes are a vital cog in online business and Internet marketing, which the Irish government strongly supports, zip codes are still not a reality some ten years after being first mooted. It now transpires the government are trying to link postcodes more to individuals than places in order to tie in taxation gathering more tightly and probably unjustly.

So there you are now. Don’t loose any sleep over it all but, try to be a little bit wiser!

Car Rental Worldwide. Fast Efficient Cost Effective Online Vehicle Hire Booking Service.

Buy F 1 Racing Tickets Online. Safe, Secure online purchasing. Delivery worldwide.

Win a Dream Super Car every Month. Supercar Competition. £14 million + worth of prizes

Tags: data collection, security, Facebook, Government, Little Brothers, Privacy, Social media, theft, state piracy,

Computer & IT Security – Irish Government – Major Source for Concern – Food for Thought.

Posted on Friday, 19 October, 2012 by arthurohara | 1 Comment

In view of the fact there are major integrations between EU Governments, the Irish Government and its Departments computer & IT systems, can the Irish citizen be fully assured that their privacy, private and sensitive personal data is secure?

Additionally, is there confidence and assurance that national confidential data, though limited enough, is secure?

Are adequate measures taken to prevent the theft by nefarious electronic and or physical means, data the use of which would benefit criminality, terrorists or any other type of suspect or illegal activity nationally or internationally?

Is there any ongoing security REVIEW detection process in place by Government and all computer aligned Government Departments and any other such agencies to detect any suspicious activities relating to the integration of data process and the data contained within it or aligned via other connected portals to it?

Does the Government have in place any policy or an incentive scheme whereby rewards can be paid to people who point out security breaches?

Is there a likelihood that security leaks can be perpetrated and is there an adequate ongoing security policy and POLICING in place to prevent any form of leaks?

Are all staff acquainted and kept up-to-date on measures they must undertake and adhere to in order to prevent or even lessen the possibility of a security leak occurring unintentionally or being perpetrated?

Do staff bring work home with them on laptop, notebook, smartphones or other data holding devices that are not adequately encrypted in the event of theft or suspicious loss. Likewise do staff have the ability to access sensitive encrypted data using cipher keys on state IT systems from home via local personally owned or operated IT devices? By virtue of the fact that few civil servants work to full potential those minority that work very hard get all the work. It becomes so intensive they probably take work home with them.

While I can appreciate and expect that any form of response will not be forthcoming nor indeed a tailored standardised non-response that security matters are not discussed, maybe there is some food for thought in this for a dysfunctional Civil Service who do not exude any sort of competence and confidence to ever get the job done right!

When you have senior civil servants from the Department of Justice, Equality & Law Reform and also Foreign Affairs meeting locally and abroad with foreign security services and agencies like MI5, when such should be conducted by experienced security personnel from the national police force An Garda Siochana, it leaves a hell of a lot to be desired and does little to generate any form of a sense of professionalism, security or confidentiality especially when they talk about it afterwards on a bar stool. They may know a little about some things but its all second-hand. They certainly know nothing about any element relating to the area of middle east muslim fundamentalist terrorism activity in Ireland, nor indeed the so called “real ira”. For them its just for the ego trip and a premier class, executive room, high end junket. There is probably a special allowance for it too! Treasonable ignorance would be at the top of my description for such activity.

Ireland is a very small country in a very big world. It does have the knowledge and expertise to mind it’s own affairs when it comes to IT and security issues generally. The Government and its dysfunctional civil service simply destroy those abilities.

There is no confidence! History shows us all of the flaws. Don’t for one minute think that the process has changed.

Car Rental Worldwide. Fast Efficient Cost Effective Online Vehicle Hire Booking Service.

Buy F 1 Racing Tickets Online. Safe, Secure online purchasing. Delivery worldwide.

Win a Dream Super Car every Month. Supercar Competition. £14 million + worth of prizes won

Governance in Ireland – The Irish Nation Destroyed by a Political Party!

Posted on Thursday, 6 September, 2012 by arthurohara | Leave a comment

As a true Irish man, I firmly believe that Irish cynicism, begrudgery, inefficiency, sloppy thinking, addiction to alcohol, corruption, fraud, malpractice, greed, certain sports, entertainment and the craic – i.e. that boring, juvenile type trivia on a bar stool, with many individuals 45 years on the dole, is more responsible for ‘the state of the nation’ than the coalition Irish government we have voted into power – one faced with carping disdain from the same electorate which voted consistently for Fianna Fáil’s self-interested, corrupt, pocket-lining, perfidy, 54+% according to available figures.

Ireland has no rightful place among the politically evolved post-WWII nations of Western Europe because it’s government of the day cowered away and chickened out of its responsibilities with a deceitful preference that Hitler might win. Many thousands of brave Irish men identified the dangers, fought and died under the flags and in the ranks of foreign armies. Can you imagine how proud they would have been to fight under their own flag? Indeed some nations rightly gave them their Irish military identities, under which they were proud and honoured to fight and die. It’s a disgrace in itself that only now are those brave people being recognised by the Irish State.

Ireland has been for too many years a “let’s pretend” farce of a crony ridden banana republic, resulting today wherein practically the only and main ‘functional’ infrastructure is that provided by EU money & close Troika fiscal governance. That’s how bad they got it wrong.

The audacity was raw lies, deceit and incredibly toxic indoctrination when at the approach to the pinnacle of our fiscal & governance woes they told us we had “turned the corner“.

FF spent the country’s ‘wealth’ primarily on themselves, certain elites, cronies and electoral bribes. These elites, cronies are still presently benefiting. They need to be identified, singled out and have their assets stripped – to pay back what rightly belongs to the entire populous of the nation. Those corrupt and crooked and everyone aligned to them still have a big price to pay & should spend the remainder of their life behind bars doing hard labour.

The Irish public service and semi-state bodies are an overpaid, dysfunctional shambles peopled in the main by lazy pass-the-buck inefficient unintelligent officials immersed in their own bullying ‘little autocratic’ privileges, dynasties and self importance. Not one of them would be able to put forward an adequate honest contradiction to this. Where else but in such a country would you have people like County Managers paid more than the Prime Minister of Spain! Contracts do not have to be honoured in view of the obvious nefarious and unethical way in which they were drawn up and implemented.

It is so easy to tear up the contract when it comes to the less well off and less powerful ordinary man and woman in the country.

It is sad to note that so many Irish people appear to have been contaminated by the Celtic Tiger imperative of ‘instant gratification’ uselessness and ‘idle talk’.

It is a pity the factual history (readily available) has been ignored as a ‘primer’ on how NOT to govern a country.

From Anthony Jordan’s, ‘Eamon De Valera, 1882-1975; Irish; Catholic; Visionary’, and comments by Tim Pat Coogan, “De Valera instituted a hierarchical political class, a Catholic state” and, “knew how to get and hold onto power”. He established the Irish Press (control of the media), the Fianna Fáil party, and a Constitution which gave ‘special place to the Catholic Church, “which did not stand the test of time“.

Just look at the last three Taoisigh Fianna Fáil produced. “SC**BAGS”. Those who care don’t matter and those who matter don’t care!

The then on-going violence instigated by De Valera’s “Machiavellian approach to the Treaty and antipathy to Collins”, (whose MURDER he arranged) e.g. civil war and IRA attacks on Northern Ireland, has largely been ignored/written out of Irish history. He survived execution in Kilmainham Gaol by NOT BEING IRISH but claiming American citizenship. Fianna Fáil rehabilitated De Valera by putting a certain history in all schools”. Brainwashing! This is a fact! That so many Irish students and elders alike are historically illiterate can be explained when one comprehends, even in recent times that, “Mary Hanafin as Minister for Education did not allow a book with another viewpoint to be distributed, even at no cost to the schools”.

We are planning to attempt to give celebration, as a bankrupt people for 1916! (Troika take note). Let’s rethink this madness and forget about that era!

There were no doubt some brave but foolish people dragged into the rising, as it is referred to. However an average-minded half intelligent person at the time knew that Britain was anxious to pull out of Ireland entirely. It was fighting the Great War and had many other more serious issues to deal with. The empire was breaking up. Britain was ready to go and leave the island to the Irish.

We had a few typically corrupt lying thieving gombeen Irish and half Irish men who craved power! ‘Now’s our chance, they thought’ to kick the Brits out while they were a bit down and under pressure, give them a bloody nose & we will take power in a glorious warrior-like way in an instant. Typically exceptionally stupid planning there – they only lasted a couple of days- many people more brave than some of the prominent leaders were killed unnecessarily. Those sad ilk who instigated the rising in order to grab power typically reneged on their perceived bravery and could not even offer a dignified surrender. Those who thought they could grab power were taught a lesson & most deserved what they got!

To the objective observer, 26 county Ireland has in the main suffered under an extreme right-wing theocratic and oligarchical collusion.

That is the real elephant in the room!

That is the history that decades of supine Irish voters dare not confront when they conveniently transfer blame onto (‘the EU’, ‘French’, ‘Brits’ or ‘German’ Nazis) and latterly ‘the present Irish government. In ten years time Ireland will be a completely different country simply because of the expanding multi-racial multi-ethnic population we now have taking root in our midst. About time too! Never again to be governed by the ilk that has in the main gone before.

To use a criminally convicted politicians phrase, and there should be many more so convicted, “let’s draw a line in the sand” and determinably comprehensively separate our inglorious past from the present and the opportune possibility to generate an honest, equal, secure, peaceful and fair-for-all future for all of the people of our small proud nation Éire.

End
5 Sep 2012.