Home » Posts tagged 'Security'

Tag Archives: Security

This is what happens.

Posted on by | Leave a comment

Reflections on the remarkable return of Mr Donald J Trump.

This is what happens!

This is what happens when you ignore what millions of ordinary people have been saying for most of the last decade.   

This is what happens when instead of addressing their concerns you jam even more mass immigration, broken borders, social disorder, woke policies, gender madness, soft-on-crime policies, high taxes, regulation, and cultural chaos down their throats.  

This is what happens when instead of treating your fellow citizens with respect you choose to berate them, spread innuendo & false unfounded propaganda against them once again, like you did in 2016, as “Nazis”, “fascists”, “MAGA extremists”, “insurrectionists”, “garbage”, and more.  

This is what happens when the only people who refuse to acknowledge that most voters do not want to live in a world with open borders, mass migration, soft-on-crime policies, high taxes, restrictions on free speech, forever wars, and the sexualisation of our children happen to be the very people who control our institutions.  

This is what happens when you allow our public, taxpayer-funded institutions, from universities to schools, to be hijacked and taken over by radical ideologues who use their power to impose a stifling, unscientific, and deeply divisive woke agenda on everybody else, including our families and children.  

This is what happens when you use the legacy media, and the creative and cultural industries, to try and radically reframe the national story, telling ordinary people who love their nation that they should be ashamed and embarrassed of the very things that make them a people – their shared sense of history, identity, culture, and ways of life.  

This is what happens when you ignore how the White, Hispanic, Latino, and African American working-class have been completely clobbered on two sides at the same time—by a rampant hyper-globalisation that saw global firms offshore jobs to exploit cheap migrant labour overseas, and by a radicalising elite class that simultaneously ushered into Western economies masses of cheap migrant labour through illegal and legal migration to satisfy their own sense of moral righteousness.  

This is what happens, Democrats, Labour UK, European Union Org., and some EU member states when you endlessly persecute and prosecute a former president, stage a coup against an incumbent president, replace that president with somebody who has no public mandate, talk openly about changing the rules that govern the Supreme Court, use your friends in big tech to SUPPRESS FREE SPEACH, call anybody and everybody who dares voice a different opinion a “Nazi” and then wail endlessly about ‘threats to democracy’.  

This is what happens when instead of recognising that THE TRUE SOURCE OF POWER, LEGITIMACY, AND AUTHORITY lies with the people you transfer these things away from the people below to unelected courts, judges, companies, supranational bodies, and the “expert” class, almost all of whom are utterly disconnected from ordinary people.  

This is what happens when you treat normal people who are asking entirely legitimate questions about what is happening to their country, their home, like idiots, garbage, right-wingers dismissing their questions as “MISINFORMATION” and “disinformation” while hiding information from them and using biased experts to endorse only “officially approved narratives”.  

This is what happens when instead of tolerating opinions, beliefs, and views you do not like you MAKE NO SECRET of the fact that you want to censor, restrict or shut down platforms that do give voice to the Forgotten Majority.  

This is what happens, British conservatives, when instead of leaning into the political realignment that is STILL UNFOLDING across the Western world you TURN AWAY FROM IT, treating millions of working-class, non-graduate, and culturally conservative voters from the small towns and rural areas with complete and utter contempt and falsely imprisoning them to the point of forcing SUCIDE, while at the same time release serious criminals to make room for those sentenced to prison by a ruthlessly corrupt judiciary who have terrorist autocratic tendencies as their disgusting disguise.

And, ultimately, this is what happens when instead of learning from the lessons of 2016, from Trump 1, and the continuing rise of NATIONAL POPULISM across the West, you instead choose to double down on your side and say to hell with everybody else.  

This. 

This is what happens.  

Live US presidential election results 2024.

Ongoing update: https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/us/results

How the Internet Steals and Sells your Secrets and Personal Information, Infringes your Privacy and depletes your Personal Identity Security

Posted on by | 2 Comments

YOU ARE BEING UNFAIRLY TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF BY THE BIGGEST HEIST IN HISTORY, THE ABSOLUTE INVASION OF YOUR PRIVACY AND THE LESSENING OF YOUR IDENTITY SECURITY.

Make them stop by refusing to co-operate. Boycott data thieves.

No matter what you are trying to buy, sell or source online NEVER okay your location or agree to readily giving access and personal information to most apps. It can readily be detrimental and come back to haunt you.

Only ever buy online via secure means – https//.

These thieves are given freedom to defraud because their nefarious ways are not questioned or legislated against by Internet savvy politicians and political parties who are buying and using the personal data harvested. They say it’s not illegal! The political influence is the reason it’s presently classified as not being illegal.

You probably have no idea how much of yourself you have given away on the internet, or how much it’s worth. Never mind Big Brother, the all-seeing state; the real menace online is the Little Brothers – the companies who suck up your personal data, repackage it, then sell it to the highest bidder. The Little Brothers are answerable to no one, and they are every-where.

What may seem innocuous, even worthless information – shopping, musical preferences, holiday destinations, flights, hotel reservations – is seized on by the digital scavengers who sift through cyberspace looking for information they can sell – a mobile phone number, a private email address.

The more respectable data-accumulating companies – Facebook, Google, Amazon, eBay, yahoo – already have all that. Even donating money to charity by texting a word to a number means you can end up on databases as a ‘giver’ and be inundated with phone calls from other noble causes. Once your details end up on a list, you can never quite control who will buy them.

As you surf the web, thousands of ‘third-party cookies’ track your browsing habits. Then there’s your smartphone, which can log information every waking and sleeping moment. Quintillions – yes that really is a number – of pieces of data are being generated by us and about us.

Look for example at Facebook. In a typical week, its users upload 20 billion + items of content, pictures, names, preferences, shopping habits and other tit-bits. All information that can be stored and later employed to help advertisers.

It is presently held as legal for companies to spy on us, and it is very lucrative. Some analysts estimate we’re each giving away up to £5,000 worth of data every year. A worldwide industry has emerged over the past decade that is dedicated to finding new ways of extracting and analysing this bounty. ‘Data brokers’ operate enormous clearing houses which buy, analyse and then sell online and offline data. One of the largest, Acxiom Corporation, is believed to hold information on about 500 million consumers around the world, and has annual sales of more than $1 billion. Many of the big social media companies, including Facebook, work closely with these data brokers – cross-referencing your status updates against postcodes or loyalty-card data from shops. From thousands of fragments, they can build a remarkably detailed picture of you.

They certainly won’t like my article! I’ll be keeping a sharp look out though.

A little further down the chain, companies are scooping up your tweets or Facebook posts, analysing them and selling on the results for a hefty fee. Recently Sony paid $200 million for a company that does exactly that. This doesn’t just affect exhibitionists on Facebook; if you’ve completed the electoral register, your home address is probably only a click away for anyone vaguely interested.

This harvested data can be used to figure out your probable location and logically guess at your consumer behaviour. In one infamous case, a US supermarket responded to a young female customer’s purchases by offering her vouchers for various pregnancy products. These were intercepted by an unsuspecting and very irate father. In another, a GPS service designed to help drivers find quick routes was also selling the information to the Dutch police, who could use it to work out who was breaking local speed limits. Each year, the Little Brothers get more clever.

This makes it easier than ever for companies – and even politicians – to pin you down with personalised and effective marketing, messages and offers. The UK Labour party has recently hired one of Barack Obama’s digital gurus, Matthew McGregor. Don’t be surprised to see creepy targeted ads from Dave, Ed and Nick at the next general election, based on some innocuous comment you might have made on your Facebook page about wind farms or Tory policy on pensions.

How worried should you be? Having slightly less irrelevant ads popping up on your screen hardly amounts to a sustained attack on your freedom. Data brokers can’t break down your door. And after all, when you join a social network or run a search on Google, it’s an exchange: you let people spy on you, and they give you a fulsome service for free.

NOTE; NB:
But this exchange is starting to become a bit one-sided. Every time we download an internet app, we accept a lengthy list of terms and conditions. Unfortunately few of us really know what we’re signing up to – one recent survey found under half of us knew that mobile phone apps can collect and store personal data.

And those terms and conditions? They’re usually comprehensible only to a contract lawyer with a background in software engineering, but we click yes and hope for the best. The results were explained well in a recent documentary, Terms and Conditions May Apply. ‘ The greatest heist in history wasn’t about taking money,’ says the voice-over. ‘It was about taking your information- and you agreed to all of it.’

Agreement, in this case, means clicking ‘OK’ to the contracts that include all sorts of worrying, loosely worded clauses – and which it would take about a month of your life each year to read properly. But perhaps you should set that time aside. A British firm recently included a clause which asked for permission to ‘claim, now and for evermore, your immortal soul’ – a techie’s joke which harvested 7,000 souls in one day.

‘Hello, we’re trying to find somewhere we can smoke…’

When the hugely popular Instagram updated its user agreement to say that ‘a business… may pay us to display your photos… without any compensation to you’, uproar ensued, the clause was removed, and the company declared that it had never intended to sell on photos. But in order to opt out of data collection, or to object to nasty terms and conditions, you have to know exactly who’s collecting your data- and it’s hard to know where to start.

Civil liberties groups are increasingly concerned, because they realise that companies, police and governments have a mutual interest in the gathering of personal data. Nick Pickles, head of Big Brother Watch, says large-scale commercial data collection is a ‘dream come true’ for governments because it dramatically extends the possibility for surveillance. Intelligence agencies don’t need to spy on you any more; they can simply go to the relevant internet companies and prise out of them what they need.

All this data is also a goldmine for fraudsters. Identity theft is increasing, which is no surprise seeing how much information people post about themselves online. Often we’re complicit. In saying where we are on our social media accounts, we also say where we are not. The website pleaserobme.com is a joke – but it has a serious point behind it, a rather brutal reminder of the dangers of location-sharing online.

The internet, of course, is just getting started. More and more everyday objects are being fitted with microchips: fridges, keys, wallets, cars. And even hair: Sony recently filed a patent for a SmartWig that could take photos and vibrate when you receive a message. Google’s augmented reality glasses will be able to record what and who you’re seeing. On a more mundane level, smart energy meters which can record your energy consumption patterns will be installed in every home by 2020. As it stands, no one really knows who will own all this information, and how will it be regulated.

The public is getting worried. So what should we do? The past six months have seen a flurry of ‘crypto–parties’ – free workshops to learn about how to protect your privacy online. (I attended a packed event recently.) Anonymous browsers like ‘TOR’, often used to access the ‘dark net’, are becoming more popular. The dark net is usually referred to as an online underworld where drugs, pornography and worse are bought and sold – but it’s also one of the few places you can go to escape Brothers Little and Big. Even Facebook users who were once happy to share everything are tightening their privacy settings.

Here is another danger. It’s right that people should be able to keep things private, but the vitality of the internet depends on people sharing information: that was the whole point of the net when it began as an academic project in the late 1960s. The more you share, the more you receive. And there are many beneficial uses of data. Professor Nigel Shadbolt, director of the Open Data Institute, says that Google has been extremely successful at using search terms to understand how epidemics spread. Satnav technology is getting better at avoiding traffic jams, because of drivers agreeing to share their progress. (http://www.waze.com). Analysing our energy consumption patterns could cut down bills dramatically.

As a ComSec consultant, I am extra keen to make this a serious discipline. Professor Shadbolt thinks if we can analyse the use of social media while respecting privacy and consent, the benefits to society in general could be immensely important.

The digital revolution has transformed our lives, but the technology that does so much for us comes at an unfair cost. For good or ill, the internet has ravaged notions of privacy: It’s not really possible to get by in the modern world without sharing information about yourself. The question is how to control that.

The Germans already have a term, informationelle selbstbestimmung, which translates into knowing what data you have and being in control over how it’s used. In part, that means us wising up to exactly what data is being sucked out of us. It also requires companies to be transparent about what data they’re sucking – and how they’ll use it. At the moment it’s still too shadowy and confusing. Basic market competition should help. As the value of our personal information grows (and we become more aware of that value), companies that are open about what they’re using will have a significant advantage over competitors. The big players are already looking for ways to give users more control over their data: even Axciom has started to open up a little. It makes good business sense, and probably helps that some savvy politicians and quangos on both sides of the Atlantic are starting to pay more attention to this issue.

The Russian scene is brutal.

But it may be that we do not want the Little Brothers to stop watching us entirely – we’ve become dependent on the services they help to deliver so cheaply. One of the reasons firms like Amazon and Google have grown so huge is that they deliver services which billions of us want. The majority of Europeans now use Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or another social media accounts – none of which charge us a penny. As the saying goes: if you’re not paying, you’re the product.

In Ireland the government and revenue authorities have been holding back on an absolutely crucial postcode system for the country.

Though postal codes are a vital cog in online business and Internet marketing, which the Irish government strongly supports, zip codes are still not a reality some ten years after being first mooted. It now transpires the government are trying to link postcodes more to individuals than places in order to tie in taxation gathering more tightly and probably unjustly.

So there you are now. Don’t loose any sleep over it all but, try to be a little bit wiser!

Car Rental Worldwide. Fast Efficient Cost Effective Online Vehicle Hire Booking Service.

Buy F 1 Racing Tickets Online. Safe, Secure online purchasing. Delivery worldwide.

Win a Dream Super Car every Month. Supercar Competition. £14 million + worth of prizes

Tags: data collection, security, Facebook, Government, Little Brothers, Privacy, Social media, theft, state piracy,

20131209-015337.jpg

Computer & IT Security – Irish Government – Major Source for Concern – Food for Thought.

Posted on by | 1 Comment

In view of the fact there are major integrations between EU Governments, the Irish Government and its Departments computer & IT systems, can the Irish citizen be fully assured that their privacy, private and sensitive personal data is secure?

Additionally, is there confidence and assurance that national confidential data, though limited enough, is secure?

Are adequate measures taken to prevent the theft by nefarious electronic and or physical means, data the use of which would benefit criminality, terrorists or any other type of suspect or illegal activity nationally or internationally?

Is there any ongoing security REVIEW detection process in place by Government and all computer aligned Government Departments and any other such agencies to detect any suspicious activities relating to the integration of data process and the data contained within it or aligned via other connected portals to it?

Does the Government have in place any policy or an incentive scheme whereby rewards can be paid to people who point out security breaches?

Is there a likelihood that security leaks can be perpetrated and is there an adequate ongoing security policy and POLICING in place to prevent any form of leaks?

Are all staff acquainted and kept up-to-date on measures they must undertake and adhere to in order to prevent or even lessen the possibility of a security leak occurring unintentionally or being perpetrated?

Do staff bring work home with them on laptop, notebook, smartphones or other data holding devices that are not adequately encrypted in the event of theft or suspicious loss. Likewise do staff have the ability to access sensitive encrypted data using cipher keys on state IT systems from home via local personally owned or operated IT devices? By virtue of the fact that few civil servants work to full potential those minority that work very hard get all the work. It becomes so intensive they probably take work home with them.

While I can appreciate and expect that any form of response will not be forthcoming nor indeed a tailored standardised non-response that security matters are not discussed, maybe there is some food for thought in this for a dysfunctional Civil Service who do not exude any sort of competence and confidence to ever get the job done right!

When you have senior civil servants from the Department of Justice, Equality & Law Reform and also Foreign Affairs meeting locally and abroad with foreign security services and agencies like MI5, when such should be conducted by experienced security personnel from the national police force An Garda Siochana, it leaves a hell of a lot to be desired and does little to generate any form of a sense of professionalism, security or confidentiality especially when they talk about it afterwards on a bar stool. They may know a little about some things but its all second-hand. They certainly know nothing about any element relating to the area of middle east muslim fundamentalist terrorism activity in Ireland, nor indeed the so called “real ira”. For them its just for the ego trip and a premier class, executive room, high end junket. There is probably a special allowance for it too! Treasonable ignorance would be at the top of my description for such activity.

Ireland is a very small country in a very big world. It does have the knowledge and expertise to mind it’s own affairs when it comes to IT and security issues generally. The Government and its dysfunctional civil service simply destroy those abilities.

There is no confidence! History shows us all of the flaws. Don’t for one minute think that the process has changed.

Car Rental Worldwide. Fast Efficient Cost Effective Online Vehicle Hire Booking Service.

Buy F 1 Racing Tickets Online. Safe, Secure online purchasing. Delivery worldwide.

Win a Dream Super Car every Month. Supercar Competition. £14 million + worth of prizes won